http://www.inputoutput.io/vmware-workstation-in-backtrack-3-4-live/ The free-thinkin' free-speakin' rabble-rousin' geek. Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:29:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.inputoutput.io/vmware-workstation-in-backtrack-3-4-live/#comment-854 Olivier Soyez » VMware Player module .lzm BackTrack 3/4 Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:07:52 +0000 http://www.inputoutput.io/?p=42#comment-854 [...] P.S : la méthode pour générer soi même les modules est ici [...] [...] P.S : la méthode pour générer soi même les modules est ici [...]

]]> http://www.inputoutput.io/vmware-workstation-in-backtrack-3-4-live/#comment-852 soyouz Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:19:59 +0000 http://www.inputoutput.io/?p=42#comment-852 Excellent, it's working! Thanks a lot for your post! Excellent, it’s working!
Thanks a lot for your post!

]]> http://www.inputoutput.io/vmware-workstation-in-backtrack-3-4-live/#comment-660 m0rebel Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:44:14 +0000 http://www.inputoutput.io/?p=42#comment-660 Nice. I often have a need to run windows programs while using Backtrack. I'd assuming installing VirtualBox as an lzm would use pretty much the exact same thing method? I know it's less popular, but VirtualBox is Free, has much better Linux kernel support than VMware (in my experience), and can actually emulate 64-bit processors on 32-bit hosts, which vmware cannot. Nice. I often have a need to run windows programs while using Backtrack. I’d assuming installing VirtualBox as an lzm would use pretty much the exact same thing method? I know it’s less popular, but VirtualBox is Free, has much better Linux kernel support than VMware (in my experience), and can actually emulate 64-bit processors on 32-bit hosts, which vmware cannot.

]]>